How can or should eLearning programs participate in the growing Open Courseware (OCW) or Open Educational Resources (OER) movement? I think that this is an important question and we are now getting some guidance. A recent update on the Internet Discussion forum on Open Educational Resources, which focused on an OECD study, starts to frame a dialog that can help academics and other program leaders decide if they want to contribute and how they might do so effectively.
From the perspective of the World Campus we might ask about how we can support the Penn State community that has interest in OCW/OER and take leadership in the larger international free content movement. The World Campus is in an interesting position, which is not at all unique relative to other online programs. We touch a lot of online courses and programs at early stages of development and throughout the course design and development process. Can we leverage our involvement in course design and development to make material more OCW/OER friendly? In addition, we are viewed as potential innovators and leaders on OCW/OER by colleagues at our peer organizations in higher education, at NGOs, and other related international organizations. Can we more effectively partner with those peer institutions to develop capacity and share practice?
The answer is yes. There must be design and development decisions that promote the usefulness of content as open educational resources, and there are a number of communities in which we can participate.
The World Campus program management team engages early with academic leaders who want to develop and deliver online programs for learners studying at a distance. Program managers along with marketers, learning designers, and other professionals work with faculty and academic administrators throughout the Penn State community to help ensure that the online program will meet expectations and be sustainable. During the process, we could ask if the academic unit would like to make the whole program, individual courses, or parts of courses available as open educational resources through an open courseware initiative. If so, we could approach design and development to include dialog of what would make the materials most useful to prospective adopters.
For example we could proactively help ensure through design and development that the materials support pedagogical intent while also being friendly for editing and reuse; cataloging, searching, and retrieval; aggregation and desegregation; internationalization and localization, accessibility, ease of access in low bandwidth environments, etc. We could work together to help ensure that the content is “free” by helping to:
- Identify file formats are open to ensure easy modification
- Select licenses that promote wide distribution
- Avoid third party materials that are licensed under restrictive terms
- Tag and package content in ways that enhance portability
- Design content at appropriate levels of granularity
In this way a more or less centralized online program could help academic units and faculty members maximize the value of the content that they want to license and distribute as open educational resources through design and development.
So…
- Does anybody know of any centralized online learning design and development shops that are supporting their production units in this way?
- If you are a faculty member, academic administrator, or somebody with an opinion out there, would this be helpful?